🐊 Canon 24 105 F4 Ii Review

The Canon 24-105mm f4 L IS USM II is a fine lens in so many ways. It’s gotten a lot of updates and improvements on its build quality and with all of the issues that were present with the first Jim. Sigma is sharper, but noticeably heavier. Also, the Sigma lacks weather sealing, which for me, is a deal breaker. It's a really nice lens though, felt great, if a bit heavy. NerdblurbSteve's gear list: Canon EOS 5D Mark III Canon EF 50mm F1.4 USM Canon EF 70-200mm F4L IS USM Sigma 35mm F1.4 DG HSM Art Canon EF 24-70mm F4L IS USM. \$\begingroup\$ "The Canon 24-105, even being f4, is a superior lens to the 50mm in almost every way." Maybe in almost every way except one: image quality . And I say that as one who has probably taken more shots with the EF 24-105mm f/4 L IS than with any other single lens (with the possible exception of the EF 70-200mm f/2.8 L IS II But I have a few reasons why the 24-105mm is a better choice for many photographers, particularly those shooting full frame: 1 – Image stabilization. Although the aperture on the 24-70mm opens up one stop more (f/2.8 versus f/4), the 24-105mm has image stabilization, which actually gives you three extra stops in low-light situations. So With its 9-bladed diaphragm, this Canon 11-24mm f/4 makes soft or no sunstars at wide apertures, and nice 18-pointed sunstars on brilliant points of light only at about f/22: Canon 11-24mm f/4 L sunstar at f/8. bigger. Canon 11-24mm f/4 L sunstar at f/11. bigger. Canon 11-24mm f/4 L sunstar at f/16. bigger. Canon EOS 5D Mark II Panasonic Lumix DMC-GH4 Sony a7R IV Canon EF 50mm f/2.5 Macro Panasonic Lumix G Vario 100-300mm F4-5.6 OIS +5 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain Macro. The Canon EF 24-70mm f/2.8L II USM isn't claimed to be a macro lens, but it delivers quite good performance nonetheless if you zoom to 70mm, where the close-focus point is at 38cm from the film/sensor plane and Canon quotes a maximum reproduction ratio of 0.21x. The following example illustrates how close you can get to the subject. Canon EOS 5D Mark IV Canon EOS 80D Canon EF 24-70mm F2.8L II USM Canon EF 100-400mm F4.5-5.6L IS II Sigma 15mm F2.8 EX DG Diagonal Fisheye +3 more Reply Reply with quote Reply to thread Complain I've loaned Sony A7III and adapted my Canon lenses (16-35mm F4L, 24-70mm 2.8II, 24-105mm F4L, 50mm 1.4, 70-200mm F4L and 100-400mm II) to it using MC-11. I found that as long as you keep it under or around 180mm the Sony A7III AF won't have issues with focusing and face detect. I think a walk-around lens spanning wide-angle to short tele is an excellent idea. When I owned a Canon 24-105/4L I didn't think much of its performance at 24mm and often wished it went out a little more than 105mm. Now Tamron has released a 35-150 lens. Has anyone seen a performance comparison between these two? Since a refurb 24-105 is currently $719 but has been on sale for as low as $599, getting my lens fixed for half this seems reasonable, unless maybe I should get the newer 24-105 f4 L IS II upgrade instead? But then, I've heard that the version II 24-105 doesn't provide a huge improvement over the older version. At 24mm, both lenses distort the image to the same extent. At 105mm f/4, I saw similar results, though it looks like the Sigma retains a bit more contrast and sharpness in the edges. Sigma 24-105mm f/4 OS vs Canon EF 24-105 f/4L IS. Looking at (approximately) 50mm, I noticed the Canon was quite soft, even stopped down to 8. Now Available!MAVEN FILTERS - Color-Coded Magnetic Photography Filters(Circular Polarizers, UV, ND Filters, Step-Up Rings, and more) On a FF body, especially on either the Canon 5D Mark III, 5D Mark IV, 1D X or 1D X Mark II, the situation is much less clear. The original Canon 24-105mm, f4L has a "lot" of barrel distortion at the wide end, plus the edges and corners lose sharpness. It's not a horrible situation in either case but the reasons why I will never have an original I can't vouch for ads below. The Canon 24-105mm f/4 L IS II is Canon's replacement for the extremely popular 24-105mm f/4 L IS of 2005 ~ 2016. This new lens' claims to fame are improved image stabilization (rated 4 stops compared to three stops in the old 24-105 IS) and less corner darkening (modern Canon DSLRs automatically correct this anyway .

canon 24 105 f4 ii review